Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 136 HP more power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, whereas torque is 210 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 11.6 | |
|
The Subaru B9 Tribeca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 660 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm longer than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 235 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 300 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |