Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 151 HP more power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, whereas torque is 263 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 12.3 | |
|
The Subaru B9 Tribeca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru B9 Tribeca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm longer than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 85 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |