Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs Nissan Murano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 148 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 227 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 12.3 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 19 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2005 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 388 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |