Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs Lexus LX 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 29 HP more power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Lexus LX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 14.5 | |
|
The Lexus LX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 840'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Lexus LX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm shorter than the Lexus LX, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2560 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover has 105 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LX. The Lexus LX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.2 metres less than that of the Lexus LX, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus LX has
| |