Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs BMW X5 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 161 HP more power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 40 NM more than BMW X5. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 8.1 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 7.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 1185 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 85 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X5 has
| |