Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 306 HP | 300 HP | |
Torque: | 425 NM | 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 6 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 14.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 86 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |