Land Rover Range Rover 2005 vs BMW X5 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 15 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 13.0 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X5 2003 4.4 engine: The main problems with the N62 engine are related to malfunctions in the Valvetronic and VANOS systems. Fluctuating idle is usually caused by ignition coil failure, air leaks, MAF sensor problems or problems ... More about BMW X5 2003 4.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 28 cm longer than the BMW X5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X5 has
| |