Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs BMW X5 2007

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2006 - 2009
BMW X5
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 272 HP235 HP
Torque: 640 NM520 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.1 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 37 HP more power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 120 NM more than BMW X5.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data8.1
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres85 litres
800 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover Range Rover SportInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect.
BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ...  More about BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.85 m
Width: 1.96 m1.93 m
Height: 1.82 m1.77 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 535 litres620 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1750 litres
BMW X5 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 85 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`755
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 72009000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
BMW X5 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv