Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs BMW X5 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 37 HP more power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 120 NM more than BMW X5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 85 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X5 has
| |