Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 102 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 267 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 90 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 320 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
| |