Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 68 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 210 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 96 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |