Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Nissan Patrol 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 112 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 260 NM more than Nissan Patrol. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 95 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2226 litres | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 275 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |