Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 82 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 95 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes R klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 551 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 16 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |