| |
Land Rover Range Rover
2006 - 2009
|
Ford Ranger
2006 - 2012
|
| Gearbox: |
Automatic | Manual |
| Engine: |
3.6 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel |
Performance |
|---|
| Power: |
272 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque: |
640 NM | 330 NM |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: |
n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds |
|
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 129 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 310 NM more than Ford Ranger. |
Fuel consumption |
|---|
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): |
no data | 8.9 |
| Fuel tank capacity: |
100 litres | 70 litres |
|
800 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. |
|
|
Drive type |
|---|
| Wheel drive type: |
All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) |
Dimensions |
|---|
| Length: |
4.95 m | 5.08 m |
| Width: |
1.96 m | 1.72 m |
| Height: |
1.82 m | 1.62 m |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 25 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm higher. |
| Trunk capacity: |
535 litres | 1500 litres |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage space.
Land Rover Range Rover has 965 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger. |
| Turning diameter: |
11.6 meters | no data |
| Gross weight: |
3`500 kg | 2`900 kg |
|
|
| Safety: |
no data | |
| Quality: |
no data | no data |
| Average price (€): |
5400 | 7400 |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
- more power
- has 4x4 drive
- lower price
|
Ford Ranger has
|
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
|
