Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Ford Explorer 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Explorer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 406 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 23 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 234 NM more than Ford Explorer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 14.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 385 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 150 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |