Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 272 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 191 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 16.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |