Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 135 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.17 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |