Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 135 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 13.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.17 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2013 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 423 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`070 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |