Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 125 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 181 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 16 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 663 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`910 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |