Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 115 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 185 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.0 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |