Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Dodge Journey 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 202 HP more power than Dodge Journey, whereas torque is 285 NM more than Dodge Journey. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm longer than the Dodge Journey, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`381 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Dodge Journey has
| |