Land Rover Range Rover 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 113 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 259 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.87 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |