Land Rover Range Rover 2010 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2010

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2010 - 2013
Volkswagen Touareg
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.4 Diesel4.1 Diesel

Performance

Power: 313 HP340 HP
Torque: 700 NM800 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds5.8 seconds
Volkswagen Touareg is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 27 HP less power than Volkswagen Touareg, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volkswagen Touareg. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.1
Real fuel consumption: 11.2 l/100km10.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Touareg is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1140 km on highway
890 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.80 m
Width: no data1.94 m
Height: no data1.71 m
Trunk capacity: no data560 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1642 litres
Turning diameter: no data11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`2002`920
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 15 20015 400
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Touareg has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv