Land Rover Range Rover 2010 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2007

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2010 - 2013
Toyota Land Cruiser
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.4 Diesel4.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 313 HP235 HP
Torque: 700 NM615 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds8.6 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 78 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.410.0
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres93 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1020 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 10 years17 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover Range Rover SportUsed also on Lexus LX
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.95 m
Width: no data1.97 m
Height: no data1.95 m
Trunk capacity: no data701 litres
Turning diameter: no data12 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`2003`300
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 15 20021 200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Toyota Land Cruiser has
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv