Land Rover Range Rover 2010 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Pathfinder) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 53 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 375 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.78 m | |
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |