Land Rover Range Rover 2010 vs Nissan Murano 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 123 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 250 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.72 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |