Land Rover Range Rover 2010 vs BMW X6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 HP | 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 68 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.70 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 570 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X6 has
| |