Land Rover Range Rover 2009 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Land Rover Freelander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 39 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 323 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 47 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 220 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |