Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 260 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 296 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 13.5 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 663 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`150 kg | 2`910 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 41 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |