Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Porsche Cayenne 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 170 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Porsche Cayenne engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 1710 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 220 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`150 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 50 200 | 79 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |