Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2013 - 2017
Mercedes ML
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.0 Petrol4.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 510 HP408 HP
Torque: 625 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds5.6 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 102 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.811.5
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 345 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 105 litres93 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway970 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.00 m4.80 m
Width: 2.07 m1.93 m
Height: 1.84 m1.80 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres690 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2030 litres2010 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 20 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 3`150 kg2`900 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 41 40014 000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
Mercedes ML has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv