Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 102 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 93 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 140 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`150 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |