Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Lexus RX 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 272 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 275 NM more than Lexus RX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Lexus RX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus IS, Lexus GS, Lexus NX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Lexus RX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 553 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
| Land Rover Range Rover has 3 litres less trunk space than the Lexus RX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`150 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus RX has
| |