Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Ford Explorer 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 510 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 625 NM | 346 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 261 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 279 NM more than Ford Explorer. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 11.0 | |
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
1060 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 595 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
Ford Explorer has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`150 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 47 800 | 15 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |