Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 114 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 230 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 1886 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 65 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 144 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 51 000 | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |