Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Mercedes GL 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 89 HP more power than Mercedes GL, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mercedes GL. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mercedes GL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GL, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GL might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.12 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm shorter than the Mercedes GL, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 680 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 680 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 2300 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GL (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes GL. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 200 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes GL has
| |