Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 67 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Lexus LX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 259 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 291 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 200 | 28 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |