Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 79 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 375 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover and Nissan Pathfinder are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 2260 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |