Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 69 HP less power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 100 NM more than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 93 litres | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 140 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 50 200 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |