Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Land Rover Discovery 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 81 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 2406 litres | |
| Land Rover Range Rover has 292 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 376 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |