Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Infiniti FX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 101 HP more power than Infiniti FX, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Infiniti FX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.0 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm longer than the Infiniti FX, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 376 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 1870 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 174 litres more trunk space than the Infiniti FX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 46 200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Infiniti FX has
| |