Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Ford Explorer 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Explorer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 475 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 6 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 225 NM more than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 12.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |