Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Ford Explorer 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 90 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 355 NM more than Ford Explorer. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 11.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover and Ford Explorer are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 45 litres less trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |