Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs BMW X6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 81 HP more power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 140 NM more than BMW X6. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.0 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1540 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X6 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm longer than the BMW X6, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW X6. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X6 has
| |