Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 11 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 232 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 476 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 200 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |