Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Porsche Cayenne 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 13 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 14 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 120 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`840 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 50 600 | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |