Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover and Mercedes ML have the same engine power, but Land Rover Range Rover torque is 20 NM less than Mercedes ML. Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |