Land Rover Range Rover 2022 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 351 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 201 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 300 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 294 mm (11.6 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 725 litres | 1061 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2727 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 336 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 102 600 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |