Land Rover Range Rover 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover 2012 and Land Rover Range Rover 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Land Rover Range Rover 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover 2012 is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover 2009, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover 2012 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |