Land Rover Range Rover 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2012 - 2017
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.0 Petrol5.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 375 HP510 HP
Torque: 510 NM625 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 seconds5.3 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 135 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.812.8
Fuel tank capacity: 105 litres77 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway790 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover SportInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 5.00 m4.85 m
Width: 1.98 m2.07 m
Height: 1.84 m1.78 m
Land Rover Range Rover is 15 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres784 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2030 litresno data
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 234 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Gross weight (kg): no data3`050
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 51 00039 600
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv