Land Rover Range Rover 2012 vs BMW X6 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 375 HP | 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 75 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 9.7 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm longer than the BMW X6, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 1525 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 30 litres less trunk space than the BMW X6. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 505 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`885 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 47 800 | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X6 has
| |