Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Lexus LX 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 565 HP | 272 HP | |
Torque: | 700 NM | 650 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 293 HP more power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Lexus LX. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 9.5 | |
The Lexus LX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 104 litres | 93 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Lexus LX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 5.07 m | |
Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm shorter than the Lexus LX, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 701 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1267 litres | |
Lexus LX has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover has 62 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LX. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Lexus LX. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`160 | 3`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 114 400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus LX has
| |