Land Rover Range Rover 2017 vs Porsche Cayenne 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Porsche Cayenne) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 440 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 101 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, but torque is 190 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 75 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Porsche Panamera, Porsche Macan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Porsche Cayenne might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 639 litres | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1710 litres | |
|
Porsche Cayenne has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 131 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`290 | 2`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 112 400 | 78 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |